- Posted 7/3/06 at 3:55 PM
- branding, fashion, life in LA
- Leave a Comment
The devil is in the details
Let’s talk about Prada wearing devils. Or is it Devils wearing Prada? Spare me the boring details, spare me your ignorance – you know the movie. It’s a great little flick despite not being as dark nor as devilish as I (or Lauren Weisberger i would think) had hoped. In fact, there seemed to be a wave of Disney to it all. Perhaps that was just the appearance of Anne Hathaway still smacking of too many cinderella meets princess bride roles. (I’m assuming that’s a brand stigma the girl is hoping to eventually shake.) None-the-less, The Devil Wears Prada was fun. But boy, did it make me miss a) NYC, b) my black vamp boots and… c) hello – my 21 rubbermaid bins of designer clothing. So I immediately drove home, and straight to the closet I ran – and dug out the closest thing to Prada I owned. (Accessories don’t count.) And yes, I put on the Gucci Suit and slunk around the apartment channeling my best Paris Hilton. I even promised myself to conduct business in the likes of a suit, despite how casual the rest of LA may continue to lie. And to think I wasn’t even drunk.But kudos to Meryl, Stanley Tucci and – the Devil’s marketing team. Have you checked out the movie’s website? If you did, chances are that right now you are on ebay surveying the potential possibilities to freshen up the wardrobe. Some of you are probably already bidding. Heavily. After all it’s a chance to own Sergio Rossi Suede Pumps while simultaneously helping out a fellow sis in need, all proceeds going to a worthy cause. It’s a beautiful give and take. But the question is… are the clothes really all size 4′s?
Yes, it’s all fun and fab. But I must admit that there seemed to be one brand sponsor glaringly missing from the pack. Good Lord, where was Prada?
Dear Prada,
It occur to Brand Girl that given the extensive media blitz surrounding the release of the movie bearing a similar name, that there was a prime opportunity for your brand to propel such press and possibly… ummm, spread the Prada? I know, I know, but I was thinking that just this once, you could create a little couture for mass market. Maybe you could have partner with Net-A-Porter and filtered out a limited edition Prada bag in honor of the devil. Not only furthering movie madness, but helping to dignified my sisters who continue to tote around their Canal Street knock-offs as if they were actually Prada. Oh but wait, I think Patricia Field did a devil bag. But hello – it’s not Prada. Or how about a perfume? Oh, I mean parfums. I’m going to go out on a limb here, but you could’ve called it, hmmm… “Prada. (and in a whispery metrosexual voice…) “the devil.” Yes, it seems to me that although the title of the movie alone has garner much attention for your brand, to have ridden the wave a tad harder within a new audience might have better served all parties involved – especially my sisters. It could have been Prada’s one small step to serve womankind at large. (sniff)
Oh well. Maybe next time.
Brand Girl
*xoxo*
I am 
recent comments
I totally agree. And nothing wrong about being patriotic.
Great insights…I don’t think the audience cares who wins the awards, they just want to see the “show” so they have something to talk about the next day…and BTW- the Chrysler commercial was my favorite! Anything that promotes America building something again is ok with me…I guess I’m just a sucker for patriotism…
Nice article! It makes a great deal of sense. These companies spend so much to attain new clients but rarely put forth the effort to keep their existing ones happy. Everything is an argument or an angle. I guess they think we will forget.
I ask this lovingly Steve: by any chance, are you wearing a tie and nursing a martini?
Looking at Obama’s overall rising star these past years (and especially thinking back to who even knew his name prior to 2004), he is a media genius indeed. Yet at the same time, just as he’s not a Muslim (although 24% of the public still thinks he is), he’s also not the political Messiah his campaign painted him to be. In offering an opinion about this widening disparity between the myth and the man, which any Brand Girl is entitled to do, I simply pointed out some of his media missteps since taking office. Speculating that Obama might be a one-term prez unless he gets his media act and his policy act together—and playing nice with one another—is no more a diss than thinking Derek Jeter was playing kinda dirty when he faked getting hit by a pitch to get on base. That’s not dissing, and it’s not even playing party politics. It’s just stating the obvious.
And ’cause I can’t resist: when out with a girl, especially a bipartisan one, allow her a chance to take a full swing when at bat in a pennant battle of the minds. I’ll bet the house that she’ll get beyond first. And she won’t have to fake a thing either.
Funny piece but a faulty premise.
Obama is still a media genius. He’s controlling the debate and has accomplished more in his first two years than any President since FDR. Sure his approval numbers are down but we are in a the middle of a severe recession. Regan’s numbers were similar in 1982.
He has tried to be bipartisan but what does he get for it? The GOP even filibustered small business tax cuts (until two GOP senators who are retiring broke off yesterday). The public knows this. While they are anti-incumbent, they trust the GOP less than the Dems. And despite the GOP’s concerted efforts to block efforts to stimulate the economy (so they can hope to pick up more seats), the economy will turn around and the the POTUS’s appoval ratings wil improve with the rise in GDP.
And when out with boys, especially thoughtful ones, it’s probably not a good idea to diss Obama; not if you want to get to first base.