- Posted 12/5/08 at 8:34 AM
- branding
- Leave a Comment
GM – Are they telling it like it is?
The boys are back! This week, the big three automakers are back in Washington jetless and armed with plans for round two of the bailout chronicles. Before heading to D.C., Ray Young, CFO of GM, made his case on GM’s Facts and Fiction (GM Tells It Like It Is) blog in a last-ditch effort to restore flagging confidence during this “credit crisis.”
Welcome to the era of crisis management. Props to GM as they use the tools of social media to try and avoid hitting the wall. It won’t be good that the U.S. automakers collapse—I heard on NPR that one in ten jobs in the U.S. is auto-related. But just like seeing slashings of 40% off at luxury retailer Bergdorf Goodman on Black Friday, the world has run amuck. And Detroit isn’t the only thing off its axis.
Everyone has chimed in about the U.S. auto industry, from Seth Godin calling for less monopoly and more competition to Michael Moore just hootin’ and hollering. All in all, not ideal that Ford, GM and Chrysler potentially to be curbed, but truth be told, consumer confidence and sales have been declining long before the credit crisis. How will bailing them out change things?
So the big three’s head honchos are talking about $1 for 2009 compensation, and the UAW finally reasonable and willing to make long-needed concessions to have its workers become competitive—domestically and globally. It’s a start. There’s also the plan to rebrand GM as green and energy efficient, which ties into the greater branding trend… okay, they’re just a decade late. And that is why they suffer–the credit crisis just exposed their mistakes. We’ve got a massive conglomerate that chased bottom lines rather than following a branding strategy that responded to its consumers and marketed products that work. Instead, we were handed the dictatorial “Buy America, for America.” The emperor’s marketing’s got no clothes—and someone’s finally telling him.
Collectively the U.S. auto industry spends about $6 billion annually in advertising, and yet for all that spending, market share pales to foreign makers. Toyota, Mercedes-Benz, BMW, Honda, Volkswagen, Audi and Hyundai all held or bettered their positions on Interbrand’s Best Global Brands 100 List. (Ford slipped, but GM and Chrysler were nowhere to be found). The fact is that the big three haven’t done a heck of a good job at branding its brands or serving the U.S. markets.
Now, for all intensive purposes, the big three can be considered start-ups. Just like discount coupons, handouts and the notion of roommates, the stigma of bankruptcy is being redefined. Maybe we need to tell the boys to take a number and get in line…
I am 
recent comments
I totally agree. And nothing wrong about being patriotic.
Great insights…I don’t think the audience cares who wins the awards, they just want to see the “show” so they have something to talk about the next day…and BTW- the Chrysler commercial was my favorite! Anything that promotes America building something again is ok with me…I guess I’m just a sucker for patriotism…
Nice article! It makes a great deal of sense. These companies spend so much to attain new clients but rarely put forth the effort to keep their existing ones happy. Everything is an argument or an angle. I guess they think we will forget.
I ask this lovingly Steve: by any chance, are you wearing a tie and nursing a martini?
Looking at Obama’s overall rising star these past years (and especially thinking back to who even knew his name prior to 2004), he is a media genius indeed. Yet at the same time, just as he’s not a Muslim (although 24% of the public still thinks he is), he’s also not the political Messiah his campaign painted him to be. In offering an opinion about this widening disparity between the myth and the man, which any Brand Girl is entitled to do, I simply pointed out some of his media missteps since taking office. Speculating that Obama might be a one-term prez unless he gets his media act and his policy act together—and playing nice with one another—is no more a diss than thinking Derek Jeter was playing kinda dirty when he faked getting hit by a pitch to get on base. That’s not dissing, and it’s not even playing party politics. It’s just stating the obvious.
And ’cause I can’t resist: when out with a girl, especially a bipartisan one, allow her a chance to take a full swing when at bat in a pennant battle of the minds. I’ll bet the house that she’ll get beyond first. And she won’t have to fake a thing either.
Funny piece but a faulty premise.
Obama is still a media genius. He’s controlling the debate and has accomplished more in his first two years than any President since FDR. Sure his approval numbers are down but we are in a the middle of a severe recession. Regan’s numbers were similar in 1982.
He has tried to be bipartisan but what does he get for it? The GOP even filibustered small business tax cuts (until two GOP senators who are retiring broke off yesterday). The public knows this. While they are anti-incumbent, they trust the GOP less than the Dems. And despite the GOP’s concerted efforts to block efforts to stimulate the economy (so they can hope to pick up more seats), the economy will turn around and the the POTUS’s appoval ratings wil improve with the rise in GDP.
And when out with boys, especially thoughtful ones, it’s probably not a good idea to diss Obama; not if you want to get to first base.